Hugging Face's logo
kanaria007's picture
1

kanaria007 PRO

kanaria007
vik5744's profile picture liamqing's profile picture MYSTERIUMBLACKBOX's profile picture
·

AI & ML interests

None yet

Recent Activity

posted an update 2 days ago
✅ Article highlight: *Programming SI-Core* (art-60-043, v0.1) TL;DR: What do developers actually write on an SI-Core stack? This note sketches the programming model: **SIL** for goal-native code, **DPIR** as a typed decision IR, **CPU/GSPU backends** for execution, and **SIR** for structural traces. The point is to move from prompt surgery + log spelunking toward something closer to normal, testable, compilable software engineering. Read: https://huggingface.co/datasets/kanaria007/agi-structural-intelligence-protocols/blob/main/article/60-supplements/art-60-043-programming-si-core.md What’s inside: • why SI-Core programming differs from “LLM wrapper microservices” • the mental model: **OBS → SIL → DPIR → backend → RML → SIR** • SIL examples, DPIR sketches, and backend execution shape • local dev loop: sandbox SIRs, `si build`, `si test`, replay, inspection • testing strategy: unit tests, structural property tests, GCS regression, Genius Replay • tooling: LSP, ETH/capability lints, timeline and what-if visualizers • migration path: from plain LLM wrappers to SI-native stacks in stages Key idea: Treat decisions as **programs** with explicit goals, ETH checks, and structured effects — not as opaque model samples hidden behind prompts. Related specs (/spec): si-core-spec-v0.1.md, si-nos-design-v0.1.md, sil-compiler-spec-bundle-v0.1.md, sil-compiler-conformance-kit-v0.1.md
updated a dataset 2 days ago
kanaria007/agi-structural-intelligence-protocols
posted an update 4 days ago
✅ Article highlight: *Ethics as Institutional Interface* (v0.1) TL;DR: Ethics in SI-Core should not behave like a static safety filter or a one-time compliance checklist. It should behave more like an institution: with roles, principals, red lines, appeals, overrides, break-glass procedures, and civic oversight around auditable runtime decisions. Read: https://huggingface.co/datasets/kanaria007/agi-structural-intelligence-protocols/blob/main/article/60-supplements/art-60-042-ethics-as-institutional-interface.md Why it matters: • treats ethics as a structural interface: who can do what to whom, under which constraints, with which recourse • separates ethical governance into red-line zones, review zones, and metric zones • makes appeals, overrides, and break-glass explicit, traceable, and reviewable • connects ETH to PoLB experiments, ID / Role / Persona, and civic oversight What’s inside: • ETH as: Principal × Role/Persona × Context → ETH-Constraints → ETHDecision • a portable ETHDecision object shape (`ALLOW | DENY | ESCALATE` + exported governance verdicts) • red lines vs review-required cases vs metric-monitored cases • appeals (policy change), overrides (case-specific human intervention), and break-glass (pre-negotiated emergency procedure) • ETH × PoLB × experiments: how ethics becomes a design partner for rollout and evaluation • ETH × ID × Role & Persona: per-principal constraints, role capability gates, and persona-aware explanations
View all activity

Organizations

None yet