Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ The original dataset only had `train` and `test` splits. We applied the followin
|
|
| 47 |
* If a train-val-test split is available, we use the existing divisions as provided.
|
| 48 |
* For datasets with a train-test split only, we create a val split from the training set, sized to match the test set, and apply this across all models.
|
| 49 |
* In cases with a train-val split, we reassign the val set as the test split, then generate a new val split from the training data following the approach above.
|
| 50 |
-
* In cases with a val-test split, we split validation into train and
|
| 51 |
* When only a single combined split is present, we partition the data into train, val, and test sets in 70\%, 15\%, and 15\% proportions, respectively.
|
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
### Data Fields
|
|
|
|
| 47 |
* If a train-val-test split is available, we use the existing divisions as provided.
|
| 48 |
* For datasets with a train-test split only, we create a val split from the training set, sized to match the test set, and apply this across all models.
|
| 49 |
* In cases with a train-val split, we reassign the val set as the test split, then generate a new val split from the training data following the approach above.
|
| 50 |
+
* In cases with a val-test split, we split validation into train and val sets in 80\% and 20\% proportions, respectively.
|
| 51 |
* When only a single combined split is present, we partition the data into train, val, and test sets in 70\%, 15\%, and 15\% proportions, respectively.
|
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
### Data Fields
|